miércoles, 11 de septiembre de 2019

The end of confidence and trust on digitalisation

We take as guaranteed the digital transformation of economy and society. It is almost impossible to imagine a world that will not be fully digitised in few years taking into consideration the pace of adoption of the sucessive wave of innovations, however we should not discard that black swans exist. The black swans may be already flying over our heads as a collection of events that have broken the needed confidence to continue the accelerated adoption of digital technologies. 

Trust and confidence have been the base of the adoption of digital technologies. People has got used to include digital services as facilitators and enablers of their daily life because they didn´t feel them as the threat on private life denounced by some experts. Companies adopted the succesive wave of technological inventions due to the existance of a legal certainty that guarantee a return of investment period of the money spent. 2019 is being the year when these trust and confidence is disappearing in thin air.

On one hand, we have started the year the year with the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Although it would have been just another breach of personal data of a digital platform, the supposed consequences on the electoral processes on USA and UK make more people conscious of the unleashed power of the GAFA. Even this feeling of distrust could have vanished  as in the past (e.g remember for instance the many cases of supposed misuse of personal data by Google) with the purpose for repentance expressed, but the first leaks of the incorrect handling of private data in the personal assistant devices have reaffirmed the distrust feeling. It is yet to be seen if the adoption of this technology would be as quick as expected a year ago.

The companies and firms on their side are beginning to experience legal uncertainty on digital technologies. On one hand, technology has started to be a central element of the political debate. This circumstance is positive by itself, I believe that once a first phase has been overcome there is a need for reinforce the regulation of what is a key element of our lives. I do not think that this regulatory trend by itself may stop the adoption of technology, what deter the digital transformation is the unstability of the legal framework. This uncertainty is what companies are living with the Huawei affair and the inclusion of the company in the US govedrnment blacklist. It is bad to include a company in this kind of list with weak evidences, but it is worst to build up an environment of an undetermined grace period to work with the mentioned company.

Probably, the current conditions if they are not worsen would not be enough to stop digital transformation. However, I think that in years to come we will see on figures and statistics that the effect of this break of confidence and trust will have been a brake on the pace of global digitalisation.

miércoles, 4 de septiembre de 2019

New digital intermediaries and the lessons from history

As Shoshana Zuboff details in her book "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism", the raison d'être of digital platforms is the continuous search of new sources of data surplus. First, they started with the explotation of data sources from the virtual world. Once exhausted and taking advantage of technological advances, the logical step is the explotation of data coming from the physical world. Our location was the first target, now it is the turn of our conversations and faces. 

Let's start with the case of the explotation of our conversations. This have been the year of the first battle among the digital giants (Apple-Siri, Google-Google Assistant, Amazon-Alexa, Microsoft-Cortana) for the nascent market that promises big benefits.  According with Reuters, the Voice Assistant Market is growing rapidly over 39% of CAGR and is expected to reach at approx. USD 7.8 Billion by 2023. Other sources  are more more modest and forecast approximately USD 7.7 billion by 2025, although with a similar CAGR of above 39% between 2019 and 2025.

The new market of products and services has begun to raise the eyebrows of regulators, particularly after the leak of private conversations recorded with Google Assistant and the confirmation of the recording and listening of conversations as regular practice to improve the product, furthermore they identified the practice as "a critical part of the process of building speech technology, and is necessary to creating products like the Google Assistant”.  The practice was also recognised by Amazon and Apple, and the three market leaders agreed on a temporal pause for the recording and listening process (particularly in Europe). However, Amazon quickly restarted the practice although under an opt-out option of the users.

Beside the invasion of privacy that some European privacy watchdogs started to denounce, there may be further harming consequences to competition (similar to those we are currently experiencing in search, social networks or market places) if we do not take preventive measures. The French regulator, HADOPI, has already published a first report on the possible threats for the creative and audiovisual markets of the integration of voice assistants with audiovisual platforms. Other French regulator, ARCEP, has included voice assistants as one of the critical intermediaries between users and an open internet, and therefore as a possible target for net neutrality regulation.

The precautions with this new kind of intermediaries are more than justified due to what have happened in the short history of the digital era. Perhaps, if the same cautions would have taken in the past the present would be different.

sábado, 24 de agosto de 2019

"Malaherba" - @ManuelJabois

MalaherbaMalaherba by Manuel Jabois
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Me aproxime a la primera novela de Manuel Jabois con expectativas encontradas. De un lado, esperando leer el gran libro propio de quien a mi juicio es hoy día el mejor articulista de la prensa diaria. De otro lado, temiendo la decepción que sintió tras su lectura una persona cercana. Afortunadamente, en mi caso pudo más la satisfacción y placer en las horas invertidas en la novela, devorada en cuestión de días durante la parada biológica de las vacaciones estivales. Una lectura fácil y apasionante por cercana, todos hemos sido niños y el autor recoge con maestría la inocente visión que recordamos haber tenido durante la infancia.

El libro es una inmersión en primera persona en la la vida de Tambu, un niño que rechaza su nombre real, reconociéndose a si mismo con el nombre Mister Tamburino, nombre italianizado del Mr Tambourine Man dylanesco con el que Franco Battiato inicia su canción "Bandera Blanca". Con las diferencias vitales de cada uno, es difícil no sentir la infancia de Tambu como propia. Recuerdo en mi infancia haber sentido igualmente el mundo de los adultos como una esfera de misterios vedada a mi entendimiento, solo interpretable desde una mitología propia que compartía con otros compañeros de juegos. Lo de menos son los hitos diferentes o coincidentes que tengamos con la infancia de Tambu, aunque en mi caso me sienta reconocible en su sensación de desarraigo o recuerde las horas pasadas en salas de juegos recreativos similares a esas en que nos sumerge Jabois.

Pero la primer novela de Jabois es también un viaje desde la inocencia a la madurez. En las páginas de libro, vivimos las tensiones de crecimiento de un niño que descubre su radical diferencia respecto a otros niños, y que descubre trágicamente la necesidad de defenderla. En otros modos, algunos también hemos descubierto la obligación de hacer las cosas "para que alguien esté orgullos de nosotros", ese alguien somos nosotros mismos, el alguien del que nunca podremos escapar.

La infancia de Tambu no puede tener otra final que un final agridulce, como la de todos y cada uno de nosotros. Y es que ninguna infancia puede tener final feliz, todos terminamos descubriendo que el mundo está repleto de gente que duerme a pierna suelta sabiendo que alguien sufre por su culpa".

View all my reviews

jueves, 22 de agosto de 2019

"Amateur" by Thomas Page McBee

Amateur: A True Story About What Makes a ManAmateur: A True Story About What Makes a Man by Thomas Page McBee
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Sometimes, you read so much about a book that it disappoints to you when you actually read it. This maybe the case of my experience with Thomas Page McBee´s partial autobiography, "Amateur". The central issue of the book has always haunted me, what makes a man a man, even before my own son started his own gender transition, maybe that is the reason it has failed to provide me with any new idea that I will remember as a lesson learned from this book.

Perhaps, this is also the case of a book that has attracted so much more press attraction that it can bear. On one hand, I´m happy for the visibility given to trans people, particularly trans men who used to be less in the papers. On the other hand, I think that the many long articles about the book published have exhausted (like this in The Guardian ) has exhausted the topic of the book and the experience of the author as the first transgender boxer who fighted in the Madison Square Garden.

Nevertheless, I recommend reading the book to the majority of men, or at least the article I linked above. The book faces you with questions that you should make yourself at least once in your life, in case you have not done yet, in order to explore your own reality as a person and your attitudes towards the gender issue: Am I a Real Man? Am I Sexist? What are the social expectations around me? What attitudes from you expect other men and women in work, love, sport and friendship? Having been grown in a womenize environment (my grandma, mom, my sister and me) and the case of my own transgender son has without doubt helped me in facing these questions, but I understand that this kind of book may be the support other men would need to make his own inquiry about himself regarding gender.

View all my reviews

lunes, 19 de agosto de 2019

"La saga/fuga de J.B." - Gonzalo Torrente Ballester

La Saga/fuga de J.BLa Saga/fuga de J.B by Gonzalo Torrente Ballester
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

La mayor parte de la obra de Gonzalo Torrente Ballester quedó oculta para el gran público tras el tardío éxito televisivo de "Los gozos y las sombras". Un mundo de fantasía quedo por siempre sepultado bajo el descarnado relato social de la vida a comienzos del siglo XX en Pueblanueva del Conde y el final decadente de la benefactora saga de los Churruchao incapaz de enfrentarse a la brutalidad de los nuevos señoritos. Y, sin embargo, lo mejor de la larga obra del autor gallego transcurre más por los caminos de la experimentación vanguardista que por las sendas del realismo. Torrente Ballester encontró su propia fórmula de supervivencia en el exilio interior
refugiándose en una suerte de antecesor del realismo mágico, del cual "La saga/fuga de J.B." es la cumbre.

La novela relata la onírica (?) vida e historia de Castroforte del Baralla, en continuo enfrentamiento con el vecino pueblo de Villasanta de la Estrella. El pueblo protagonista del relato ha hecho de la defensa de la reliquia del Cuerpo Santo el eje de su existencia a través de los siglos, liderado por una saga de héroes que siempre coinciden en las siglas J.B. de sus nombres. La sangre de los J.B. en los momentos clave de la historia castrofortina, junto con la capacidad de la villa de levitar sobre el suelo y refugiarse en las nubes, ha permitido la supervivencia de Castrofuerte frente al centralismo absolutista. La rivalidad de Castroforte frente a Villasanta, materializado en el enfrentamiento entre los Barallobre y los Beldaña, es un trasunto fantasioso de la pugna de los Churruchao y los Salgado de "Los gozos y las sombras", con el grado mayor de libertada que daba la presunta fantasía.

El libro nos sitúa ante un nuevo momento clave de Castroforte, la desaparición de la reliquia, que habilita un viaje en el tiempo por la historia del pueblo y sus J.B. Los hilos y planos de la historia se entremezclan y suceden de la mano del relator, un J.B. impostado de nombre Juan Bastida, por más señas maestro represaliado con prisión y pérdida de oficio tras la guerra civil española. Bastida nos arrastra por un viaje en el tiempo, tomando el cuerpo de los sucesivos J.B., en una extensión de la "profesión" de medium espiritista que ejerce para ganarse pensión y manutención.

"La saga/fuga de J.B." es un libro para navegar, dejarse arrastrar por las corrientes de sus páginas hasta desembocar en su final, que no puede ser otra cosa que el inicio de un nuevo comienzo que de origen a una nueva iteración de la vida castrofortina. O quizás no, también puede ser el punto de partida una improbable ruptura con todas las ataduras y predestinaciones que llevan una y otra vez a los mismos callejones sin salida.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 7 de agosto de 2019

"Normal people" - Sally Rooney

Normal PeopleNormal People by Sally Rooney
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

"Normal people" is a book that deserves a reading, probably it is not the first reading I would recommend among the many of them I finish on a year but I have enjoyed it, particularly the second half of the book. Because the first impression you will have reading the book is that nothing happens and nothing will arise your interest about the story of Marianne and Connell, and perhaps that is the intention of the author. Nothing in first one hundred pages make you expect something more than a story of two friends-with-benefits involved forever in a vicious circle of a never declared love for each other and a lack of capacity for commitment in both.

But things begin to change when you start thinking that perhaps is a story of perhaps extremely normal and boring people, with few differents with yours and other normal people that surround you everyday. The first clue is small hint of a case of gender violence at home in Marianne´s childhood, and suddenly you find yourself face to face with a story full of many other social tabooes like cases of suicide or depression, masochist loves and more gender violence. A raw reflect of the dark side behind so many normal people.

Nevertheless, you should not be worry about traveling the desert with the reading of the first hundred pages. The authoress masters the profiling of the different people that appears in the novel, and you will enjoy the way she introduces each of them and how she is capable of providing you with a complete portray of the main characters with an impressionist style across the many pages and scenes where they appear. As many of characters start in the novel in their last teen years and finish it at the pick of their youth, the impression is that you are attending the construction on real time of their personality as they experiment their first vital successes and failures.

As this is just the second novel of Sally Rooney, I think I would probably read her next one full of expectations.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 31 de julio de 2019

Ursula´s digital plan

On July 16th, the European Parliament confirm the election of Ursula Von der Leyen as the first woman to preside the European Commission. In her inaugural speech, the new President outlined what is going to be  the Union priorities for the period 2019-2024 under the vision of "A European Union that strives for more". Although she mentioned twice at the beginning of her addressing to the Parliament her worries about the effects of digitalisation on society and economy, few more details were given about her ideas on this area. Just a paragraph on her standing in favor of a fair taxation system where tech giants pay the just share of their benefits.

Perhaps, the new President gave in her speech quite few importance for digital issues compared with what those responsables for digital sector policies in Member States and sectoral stakeholders expected. Nevertheless, the fears were partially soothed wit the publication her full political guidelines. Building up "A Europe fit for the digital age" is among what she calls the six headline ambitions for Europe over the next five years. Unfortunately, in the brochure the digital policies look again as the less fortunate member of the family, with a space of less than two pages, the shorter space dedicated to one of the six of her policy axis.

On the bright side, we should welcome that the goal to achieve digital sovereignty is rightly highlighted as the basis for the forthcoming digital policies. The need to invest in artificial intelligence, 5G, blockchain, high-performance computing, quantum computing, algorithms and tools to allow data sharing and data usage is underlined. Nevertheless, it is missed a clear bet on shared projects of common interest as the the target of these investments. Either Union Member States pool resources for the development of the platforms of the future or all the efforts were doomed to failure and Europe will reamain technological dependance on China and US.

The new Commission´s President also declares in her political programe the intention to continue with Union´s digital regulatory tradition, where Europe has excelled and contributed to leash the American laissez-faire approach. It's courageous her proposal for an AI regulation within her first 100 days in office, which will certainly face criticism from an industry that is calling for a wait-and-see regulatory approach to the matter. The promise of a new Digital Services Act is diffuse, but it is out of discussion the need go deeper in the regulation of digital platforms. There are hopeful these ideas as a sign of the purpose to maitain the goal of the development of a Digital Single Market.

On Cybersecurity, it may looks short that only the idea of the creation of a joint Cyber Unit is included among the ideas for the future digital policies, although it´s highly needed because the landscape of cybersecurity units and agencies has grown in the past without an aim. However, this renewal of the governance is complemented with her statement in favour to reinforce the European Union response and resilience to hybrid threats which is included among the ideas for building a "Stronger Europe in the world", another of the six headline ambitions for Europe proposed by the new President.

Finally, Ursula´s idea of making Europe fit to the digital age includes the commitment to create the digital capacities and skills base through a Digital Education Plan. The prioritisation of digital inclusiveness for individuals is complemented with the promise to support of the SMEs role as large digital innovators by reducing red tape and improving their access to the market, which is part of her idea of "An economy that works for people", another six Europe´s headline ambitions.

To conclude, it looks that the European digital vision new European Commission's President based on building-up digital sovereignty for Europe based on the completion of the Digital Single Market, the reinforcement of Cybersecurity and bridging the digital divides.  Definitively, it may be a good base for building "A Europe fit for the digital age" , although once the music is written the lyrics are needed to compose a good music piece, as well as the election of the right European Commissioner to perform it.

miércoles, 24 de julio de 2019

"El caso de las japonesas muertas" - Antonio Mercero

El caso de las japonesas muertas (Sofia Luna, #2)El caso de las japonesas muertas by Antonio Mercero
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Antonio Mercero retoma con éxito las andanzas de la policía Sofía Luna. Nos reencontramos con ella apenas un año después del último relato ("El final del hombre"), cuando retorna a su puesto de trabajo tras un año de sanción y haber finalizado la recuperación de su operación de reasignación de sexo. La transición social de Sofia Luna sigue marcando el relato, entrelazándose con la historia de la investigación de una cadena de asesinatos de rasgos psicóticos.

El autor hace de nuevo alarde de un conocimiento profundo de la realidad trans*, existiendo escasos errores en la difícil tarea de perfilar tan inusual personaje en la literatura como es Sofía Luna. Tampoco fracasa en esculpir el resto de personajes que circulan por la novela, desde el completo conjunto de familiares y relaciones de una persona trans* (padre, esposa, hijo, ex amante) hasta miembros del servicio diplomático pasando el mundo del turismo (grupos de viajantes, guías, traductores). Pero sin duda, el éxito de esta entrega es la expedición del autor por una nueva esfera de la diversidad humana, el colectivo asexual, perfectamente documentada e integrada como un elemento clave del relato.

En lo referente al relato policial, el autor mantiene la tensión e intriga hasta las últimas páginas de la novela. De mayor complejidad que el primer caso de Sofía Luna y sin embargo con un fluir más natural, permitiéndose el lujo de integrar una historia criminal paralela que además contiene elementos personales de la policía protagonista.

Al acabar el libro, se queda uno con un mayor deseo de continuar leyendo las historias de Sofia Luna que con la primera entrega. Sin duda un éxito del autor y su consagración como referencia de la novela negra hispana.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 17 de julio de 2019

The many fears around Libra

Libra is not only one of the twelve horoscope´s signs  anymore. Since Facebook´s announcement of its participation in a cryptocurrency called by that name, the predominance meaning of the word Libra has changed for many people. Only that fact give us an idea of the social network power and help us to grasp why regulators and politicians from both sides of Atlantic have got so nervous about the new cryptocurrency.

But what is Libra? Is it such different from other cryptocurrencies as to fear it? The answer is yes, it is extremely different to other popular digital coins. It is backed by a bunch of big companies (Facebook, Lyft, Uber, Vodafone, Visa), its potential user base is nearly a quarter of the population (Facebook´s users), it will be backed by physical world currencies and it will have identificable governance institutions. These among other features makes Libra the potential killer application for blockchain and predicts a rapid adoption of it.

The concerns about the new coin starts with the new source of data that Facebook would have at its disposal. Having access to the data related with the money a user has and how he spends it, in combination with the data it already has from each user, would  mean having a complete picture of a quarter of the human population. Taking into consideration the record of abuse of the personal data of the company, it is not a tranquilazing scenario. 

The stability and security infrastructure which would provide support to Libra its a second point for concern. The criticallity of Facebook´s infrastructure would increase  substantially and there are serious doubts that the company is prepare for it. The recent failure of Facebook´s services and the frecquent vulnerabilities that drive to personal data breaches are examples of pieces of news we would not like to see associate with the infrastructure where our money is deposited.

And of course, there are concerns of the consequences of such a powerful cryptocurrency for the stability of the financial system. Two of the many of these consequences has been widely commented. On one hand, some economist are warning about the impact that the frictionless currency market enable by Libra would have on weak currencies and the stability for the economies of countries that issue them. On the other hand, it may implies a complete dissapearance of the current intermediaries  of the retailing financial services.

Although Facebook has had up today show its capacity on the digital world and its ability to jump over the governments concerns, perhaps this time the mountain is so high even for Mark Zuckerberg.

miércoles, 10 de julio de 2019

"The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" - Shoshana Zuboff

The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of PowerThe Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power by Shoshana Zuboff
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

"The age of surveillance capitalism" is one of the books of the season among those interesting on the process of the digital transformation of the society and economy. Furthermore, I´m pretty sure it will transcend this season and becomes one of those few books that will inform digital policy-making for a long time. However, it´s not perfect as a book, in order to illustrate her theories, the author provides an excessive number of examples with more details that are needed.

I was fortunate to attend a key note given by Shoshana Zuboff three years ago, when I supposed she was writing this book. She was extremely passionate describing the concept of surveillance capitalism int the same terms as she described in the book. In the same manner as she does in the book, she started describing its origins in the day when a then small company called Google discovered that the data collected providing services could be used not only for improving services, but also to extract (without asking for permission) a behavioral surplus that allows to predict the future behavior of users, that could be the base for building up services for third parties.

But the exploitation of an innovative business (and surveillance capitalism deserves this qualification) needs for its consolidation a strategy. The author also shows how the mix of aggressive lobbying, revolving doors and penetration into the academy have provided Google (and others after) a competitive advantage based on its image of innovative and benefical-for-all company. This competitive advantage has been the base for an incremental development of a set of products beyond its origin as a search page, all them base on a production cycle of incursion (providing a product that aims to obtain some personal information of the users by surprise), habituation (making the service a need for users), adaptation (introducing minor changes to answer the critics on violating privacy) and redirection (looking for new manners to extract more personal information). The author rightly compares this dispossession cycle of personal information with the conquer strategies of colonial powers, that claimed more and more territories for their Empires without nay other base than brute force.

As you read the book, you will go deeper in Alice's rabbit hole. The bigger issue with surveillance capitalism companies is not the massive accumulation of data that serves for creating new services for third party which are basically the selling of privacy spheres of people (e.g. the Cambridge Analytics case). The most worrisome consequence its the capacity that these companies acquire to automate the behaviour of people in what the author called "instrumentarianism.", which we sometimes wrongly confuse with totalitarianism. That instrumentarianism. is a new political model basically on the hands of private companies more powerful than governments, only makes things worst.

As I have started, this is a must read book. Perhaps its teorethical part woulld have been explained in less pages, but perhaps that would have mean making the book less asequible to people which are not familiar with digital services. The only possible comparison with other book that I can establish is with Piketty's "Capital in the 21st century", and it will be equally influential for some years.

View all my reviews

domingo, 30 de junio de 2019

Adding confusion to Huawei´s affair

After the meeting between Xi Ping and Trump there's a feeling of relief in the tech sector. The general conclusion after the press conference given by the US President is that the tech war against Huawei has finished. I really don´t know if there are reasons to be so optimistic. My impression is that everybody was so eager of listening good news that they think they have listened good news without further analysis. Perhaps it would be good to analyse what we know so far of the supposed end of the Huawei affair.

To begin with, Trump´s declarations are contradictory up to some point. On one hand, he announced that "we´re allowing them (American companies) to sell (to Huawei)", but he refused to confirm that the Chinese tech company would be dropped from the entity list. Therefore, the meaning of this "allowance to sell" is not clear. It may mean a new postponment of the effective entrance of Huawei in the entity list beyond the already given extension of 90 days or it may means that the bunch of tech companies that have been lobbying against the ban are going to receive a partial license for selling chips to Huawei. The answer will be published (or not) by the US Commerce Department in the following days.

It's also interesting to appreciate that no mention has been made by Trump to the Executive Order on the tech supply chain published at the same time that Huawei was introduced in the entity list. It is relevant to highlight that there are signs that the order implementation has its own problems (e,g, The initial assessment of threats of the US Director of National Intelligence was not published this week as was foreseen in the order), but Trump has not give any sign that the implementation of the order was going to be stopped or paralized. This absence may mean that the crusade against the deployment of telco networks based on Huawei equipment on US soil will continue. And therefore, the pressure on US allies to ban Huawei equipment may not be relaxed.

The answer to the above doubts and many others will be given in the following days (or not), but there´s a serious chance that we may have attended only to the first scene of a new episode of confusion of the Huawei´s affair instead to its final act.

miércoles, 26 de junio de 2019

Finishing the building of the European Data Space

Data is recognized as a critical resource for the development and grow of the economy in the forthcoming years. On one hand, there will be an infinite number of data sources, which grow is driving by the dissemination of the IoT. According to IDC, 41.6 billion IoT devices will generate 79.4 zettabytes of data in 2025. On the other hand, there will be a growing demand for data from AI applications across all the economic sectors. Only the market of AI in IoT Devices will reach $9.5B in North America by 2024 with 28.% CAGR. Therefore, we are getting closer to a perfect storm with a perfect match between supply and demand.

Europe has been building a shared data space for years based on legal certainty. Firstly, with the personal data and privacy framework which is now in its second generation with the GDPR.  Now, the free flow of non personal data regulation establishes a new legal innovation without possible comparison in other geographical areas. These two elements set up the the base for trust that allows to say that the free movement of data may be called already the fifth freedom of the European Union and underpins Europe position as worthy partner in the digital economy.

However, an unlimited space for the free movement of data has no sense without unleashing the sharing of data among private and public actors.  Regarding the public sector,  with the continuous exploration of new frontiers for the re-use of public sector data that has achieved a new milestone with the third version of the PSI Directive, it may be said that there is an unrestricted access to public data. By the contrary, B2B or B2G sharing of data its yet in its infancy. 

Regarding B2G sharing of data, there's a strong case for forcing the access from governments to certain data. Data held by companies can be very relevant to guide policy decisions or improve public services. The more the data the better the planning of public services based on evidence. Starting with the data generated by utility companies and ending with data from online platforms for mobility or housing services, the definition of an harmonized European legal framework for B2G sharing of data will unleash without doubt a new wave of sustainable growth in Europe and helps to achieve the SDGs.

More complex in the issue of B2B data sharing. On one hand, any hard or soft regulation measure should be based on voluntary schemes and linked with the different business model for sharing (such as monetisation/selling data, marketplaces/exchanging data, industrial platforms/joint ventures or opendata). On the other hand, as part of this data may be personal data any sharing of it should be based on consent from the sources. The respect for business models and the user privacy rights should be also combine with awareness-raising campaigns among companies on the benefIts of sharing data.

No Single Market would be possible without a Digital dimension and non Digital Single Market would be possible without a European Data Space. Therefore, the survival of Europe as a commercial power depends of deepening and strenghtening the efforts on data regulations beyond ensuring the flow of data  it´s needed promote flooding the channels of exchange with the data itself

miércoles, 19 de junio de 2019

Collateral damage of trade wars

There's a certain probability that in five years the inclusion of Huawei in the US Commerce Department entity list will be study as the black swan event for the OS market for smart devices. Until May 16th 2019, Android was the dominant player in the OS market for Smart Phones and other consumer devices (such as TVs). The maket share of Android on smartphone OS was more than 80% and there was not pesrspective of a viable alternative to it. This position was achieved not without a fierce battle, because we should remember than less than 10 years ago Android was a minor player in the same market.

But then, the unexpected happened. The second player in the smartphone market, Huawei, was banned to use Android and forced to look for an alternative. Based on its immense R&D force (the Chinese company spends more than 15 $ billion per year), Huawei announce that it would began to distribute its own OS less than month after, just in time to avoid (or at least, to make difficult) a massive abandonement of the Huawei Smartphone by users.

There are some people who predicts a Huawei´s failure in this challenge. The main error is the comparison with the fruitless trials of Amazon or Microsoft to compete with Google in the Smartphone OS market. On both cases, the companies made the same errors. They tried to build up at the same time a market share on devices and a market share on OS. Huawei already has a market share on devices. Furthermore, while Amazon/Microsoft were not playing for surviving, Huawei has not alternative but to battle until the end. In this circumstances, even the obstacle of not having Gmail, maps and other Google apps in Huawei´s smartphone will not be a a definite hurdle, because the alternative in not having anything at all.

The first hint that Google is worried about the unexpected competitor in the OS market is already on the table. The Google lobbyist machine are beginning to fight the ban with all its forces. Even the first sign of impact of these efforts has appeared with the doubts about Huawei´s blacklisting in some high US official.

Interesting months ahead in the Smartphone OS market for once in many years. The Google dominance of this sector maybe the collateral damage of the trade wars.

miércoles, 5 de junio de 2019

Disrupting supply chains

On May 16th, US Government introduced Huawei in the Entity List, a black list of companies that no American companies could supply specific items under EAR (Export Administration Regulation). This means, basically, the ban to supply the Chinese company any software or hardware product developed in the USA. However, this ban is not only for US-Persons but also for non US-persons. In the case of foreing products that contains US-products, the supply to Huawei is also forbidden in case they contain more than a de minimis amount of controlled US content are subject to the EAR (25% of the value). The best explanation I have found of these restrictions is in this post.

Look around yourself and pick up any device that gives you access to digital services. Or think about any of the applications that you use on a daily base. Few of these products have been developed completely in just one country, usually all of them are made of different hardware or software components, each of them build up in geographical areas on different sides of the international borders.  So now imagine how difficult is to be safe  of not being breaking the restrictions if you are supplying a technological product. You would have to begin to made complex calculations in case you are using any US component. Therefore, the safe route is cutting relationships with Huawei if possible.

And this is what is happening. Important companies around the world are stopping to supply products to company for the fear of breaking the rule. Software and hardware products that are needed for Huawei products should be substituted by others. A complete redesigne and rebuild of the company flagship products will be needed. The lesson from this affair is how easy is to disrupt the supply chains even of the most powerful companies.

miércoles, 29 de mayo de 2019

The needed temporary status of self-regulation

Although we seen Internet as a massive service as quite recent and young, the truth is that its story goes back nearly thirty years old. The network and its services have evolved so quickly that even for those who lived the first years is difficult some times to appreciate how things have changed. Only for that reason is good to read books such as "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism", the one I´m currently reading. In particular, such a reading is good to discover the reasons why things have gone wrong in some aspects of how Internet is nowadays.

Without any doubt, the most hated feature of internet services is the eager for capturing our personal data. Certainly, the EU regulation such as RGPD has curtailed this trend, but things would be better for our privacy if the US would have a similar regulation. We see the later as an almost impossible event and some blame the different regulatory tradition of privacy of the situation. Nevertheless, the reason is completely different. As the author of the book mentioned above remember us, privacy was on the way of being strongly regulated before 9/11 happened, but the hangover of the worst terrorist attack ever in US soil changed everything. After the attack, the invasion of privacy by digital platforms began to be see as a useful tool for national security and everything on the US institutions rapidly forget the idea of a regulation. Obviously, platforms grasped the opportunity and went further on this area. Obviously, the platforms also quickly forget the self-regulation promises on the matter.

The lesson to be learnt of what happened is never to lose an opportunity to do the right thing on the regulation of digital platforms.

One of the most worrisome issues around digital platforms nowadays is their collaboration on spreading disinformation, particularly through target ads. After the evidence of the usage of this tool in some elections and referendums, the European Commission has tried to curve their use in the elections for the European Parliament. However, instead of passing a regulation the European Commission asked for voluntary measures from the platforms and a periodical review of their effectiveness. And apparently, things have worked.

Probably, now the temptation may be leave things as they are. That would be an error, now it´s the time to develop a regulation based on the lessons learnt instead of trusting that the self-regulations introduced will continue to work in the future. The sad tendency of human beings is to stop a voluntary costly behaviour when no one is looking. Therefore, we can expect that platforms would stop applying the non compulsory rules on place as soon as there´s no one watching thoroughly, and if you need to maintain your vigilance it would be better to do with the back of an actual regulation.

Self-regulation maybe a good temporary solution, but never a perpetual situation. If you have the evidences to regulate better take the opportunity to do it after you have tested the self-regulation measures for a while. Not taking the adecquate measures on the right time is certainly the door to future laments.

miércoles, 22 de mayo de 2019

Has Zuckerberg called for more regulation?

After many years fighting efforts to introduce regulations on the digital world, particularly the proposals in this area of the European Union, Facebook´s CEO surprised everyone with a call for a stronger regulation of the Internet. Zuckerberg pointed to four areas where he thought governments should focus their regulatory tasks: harmful content, election integrity, privacy and data portability. But what is behind this call? Has Facebook´s CEO be repented of the many scandals around the company that has been discovered the last year?

First of all, it should be highlighted the attention on the areas that Zuckerberg called to be regulated. There's no one of them where the EU has not developed policy-making efforts that Facebook has fought and accepted to comply with reluctancy. Furthermore, privacy and data portability of them is already regulated in Europe by the GDPR. Regarding harmful content and election integrity, the EU has established the framework for self-regulation that is moitoring closely in order to detect the need for regulation. Therefore, maybe Zuckerberg is uncomfortable with the close scrutiny in the latter two areas and what is calling is to a quick close of it before new areas of concern in them could arise.

Secondly, it looks that something is starting to change within the US legislative institutions. Various act proposals has arrived the Congress to be analysed related with algorithm transparency on the usage of personal data and the spread of disinformation. Therefore, Zuckerberg call for regulation maybe understood as an effort to mark the limits of the US regulatory efforts. Furthermore, the praise for the EU regulatory framework on privacy is nothing more than a call to copy this legislation in the US with any regulatory innovation that impose two different regulations in the two main Facebook markets and a race towards higher levels of privacy that may inflict more limits to the development of the company business.

Last but not least, Zuckerberg has made a careful choice of the areas he has called to be regulated. On one hand, as we have described above, he has not called for the regulation of any area that has not be already regulated or close to be regulated. On the other hand, he has not included in his list other areas where regulation is started to emerge or to be studied that would really create a change for Facebook business model, such as the introduction of a more fair global taxing system that fits with the digital world or a review of the basis of competency rules and their adecuation to online platforms business models.

So as usually happens, the call for a stronger regulation of the Internet made by Zuckerberg should be called as such but on the other way around. What Facebook´s CEO is calling is to stop exploring which regulations are needed beyond the already discovered and establishing a limit for the focus of the regulations on technical issues without entering into the regulation the market rules. It´s not a call for a stronger regulation, but a call for not introducing more regulation.

miércoles, 15 de mayo de 2019

"Filek: el estafador que engaño a Franco" - Ignacio Martínez Pisón

Filek: El estafador que engañó a FrancoFilek: El estafador que engañó a Franco by Ignacio Martínez de Pisón
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Como Ignacio Martínez Pisón, descubrí la existencia de Filek en la biografía que Paul Preston escribió sobre Franco. Entre las mas de 1000 páginas de la monumental obra del historiador inglés, un párrafo esbozaba la historia de un hombre que en la primera hora de los cuarenta años de dictadura fascista se había atrevido a estafar a Franco. Irresistiblemente, la imaginación quedaba capturada fantaseando con las escenas en las que una persona le hizo creer al dictador que era combustible lo que tan sólo era agua con ingredientes vegetales.

Me era imposible no querer saber más de quién era Filek. Busqué infructuosamente algún relato más detallado que sólo ahora existe con la obra de Martínez Pisón. La biografía del timador permite entender cómo todo fue posible. En la corte chabacana de aduladores de un dictador cuartelero, era inevitable que no tuviera éxito un charlatan que hacia remontar sus orígenes al imperio austro-húngaro. La escalada de engaños que constituye la de vida Filek, no deja de ser un entrenamiento para llegar a la audacia del golpe final, forzosamente destinado al fracaso.

Y sin embargo, el libro me ha resultado decepcionante. El autor escoge el registro equivocado de una fría investigación académica para relatar la historia de Filek. No me cabe duda que un relato más novelado, con dosis de ironía y sarcasmo, hubiera permitido una explotación mayor de la biografía del timador. Ciertamente más inventado y menos riguroso, pero quien no hubiese disfrutado con un relato cáustico de un diálogo entre Filek y el dictador.

Un libro necesario, pero una oportunidad perdida. O quizás tan solo el primer paso para que alguien escriba la obra que la historia de Filek demanda.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 8 de mayo de 2019

It´s not EU cybersecurity, it´s EU strategic digital autonomy

Cybersecurity has climb to the category of a major concern in Europe in 2019. The European Union has adopted a in Q1 a Cybersecurity Act and it is working in building up a Network of Cybersecurity Centers to boost up the Cybersecurity industry, that jointly with the existing NIS Directive defines an extending cybersecurity legal framework. There´s also an expanding network of institutions to take care of the Europeans Cybersecurity, that some people fear have overlapping powers and may itself be the seed for cybersecurity gaps.

It looks also that there are some rationale and evidence for these concerns. The Huawei affair promoted by the Trump administration has provoked the adoption of EU coordinated measures to reinforce cyber security in the forthcoming 5G networks. It would not be strange that in order to keep geopolitical balance that some EU coordinated cyber security measures around cloud services may be promoted after the suspicion around Amazon has been raised by the German government. But are all these concerns really about cyber security or are cyber security concerns the proxy for other bigger concern?

The described cyber security concerns reflects not only policy-makers worries about trusted digital services, it reflects that Europe has lost any possible control of the digitalisation of its economy and society. The main EU networks manufacturers are Chinese, the most popular digital services among European citizens and companies are provided by US companies and there are not any popular end-user device designed and build within the Union borders. European companies have been totally wiped out of the list of the main tech companies, none of them are in the list of the 20 most valuable Internet companies or the top 10 electronics manufacturers.

The debate on EU cyber security strategy should be the tip of an even more important debate: EU strategic digital autonomy. Although it is still a concept on the making, the usual definition of the term "digital strategic autonomy" are the capabilities to protect its digital sovereignty. Setting up this EU digital strategic autonomy should be one of the goals of the forthcoming European Commission.

Europe has been successful in one of these capabilities to protect its digital sovereignty, the regulation of the digital space. Without any doubt, the European model of a regulated cyberspace has overrun the US laissez-faire model and it is behind the call for regulation of the digital giants. However, it maybe a temporary victory without if the EU is not able to build up the enivronment where tech champions can flourish in a quick manner. 

Although ethics and European values should be at the center of European digital policy, there are not alone the decisive factor for catching-up US and China in the tech race. As Daniel Castro, ITIF vice president, wisely remember "You can have the more ethical race car driver, but if his car is not faster, you are going to lose". EU policy papers are beginning to be flooded of terms as Ethic AI or human-center data economy, but we should recognize that we are are definitively lagging behind and bet on policies for creating a EU fabric of digital firms. 

The building up of the EU strategic digital autonomy start with choosing the areas to compete with the other blocs. We should forget about Europe as a global digital competitor, neither US or China compete in every area. Although there are basic areas where Europe has to develop its own capabilities (AI, 5G or cyber security), the competition on services should be more focused, for instance forgetting about B2C and giving the battle in the digitalisation of transport or health.

The second step is creating a toolbox for promoting the development and scale up of companies in the selected areas. Europe has accumulated a set of best practices that should be connected in a coherent digital policy in order to help digital companies to flourish. The promotion of the digital talent in the nordic countries, the development of an effective high-speed connectivity policy in Spain, the promotion of digital entrepreunership in the United Kingdom or the boost towards Industry 4.0 are some of the successful models that may be replicated  in the other EU countries taking into account its own specificities. 

Beyond the toolbox to create and scale up companies, it is important to promote the connection and the joining of efforts among them. Both the big and small ones. This should be the main space for the European Commission efforts, with a wise use of the MFF instruments with a mix of the definition of Airbus-like projects in some services areas, the creation of funding instruments based on public-private collaboration and the elimination of barriers for digital enterpreuners mobility across Europe.

Digitalisation should be one of the central policies of the next European Commission. Europe is not only on the brink of losing definitively the tech race, it is on the brink of losing its strategic digital autonomy, and therefore its capability to be influent in the XXI century global policy. To avoid this destiny, we need to create a fabric of digital firms capable to compete in basic digital technologies and key services areas where competition is a real option. Maybe, it is the last call for a digital future in Europe.

miércoles, 1 de mayo de 2019

"Travellers in the Third Reich" - Juila Boyd

Travellers in the Third Reich: The Rise of Fascism Through the Eyes of Everyday PeopleTravellers in the Third Reich: The Rise of Fascism Through the Eyes of Everyday People by Julia Boyd
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Fifteen years ago I read many books about the rise and fall of the Third Reich and their main characters of that dark period of European history, such as Kershaw´s biography on Hitler or the narration of that regime written by Michael Burleigh. I thought I would never pick for reading any other book related with that epoch until I saw in a shelf "Travellers in the Third Reich", but the promise of a narrative of the period trough the eyes of ordinary people was enough to convince me.

The book span Germany's history from 1919 to 1945 giving the testimonies of a collection of people who travelled those years for pleasure or business across the country, the majority of them from Britain and USA but also from places as remote as China. The selection of travelers done by the author includes people from many different backgrounds, from upper class and aristocrats to sportsmen, from religious ministers to journalists. This variety ensures a 360º perspective of what the world thought at that time of nazism and the list of events and milestones that paved the way to the Second World War.

From the pages of the book emerge a shameful view of Germany and the anglo-saxon world of that period. On one hand, a country fully anti-semitic with few exceptions that cheered and received warmly the measures to restraint jewish influence and economic power. On the other hand, a sympathetic view of the nazi regime shared by many British and American people that saw Hitler as a providencial man for Germany. In particular, the book is the accusation testimony of how the majority of anglo-saxon people chose not to see what was happened in Germany until it was too late.

However, examples of brave behavior may also be found in the book. Foreigners that help Jewish people to escape from the Reich putting their life at risk or journalist that desperately warned the world about the real face of the regime behind the image of being the lever for the courageous renaissance of a defeated country. It is easy today to be shocked by the fact that these people were a minority, but perhaps we should ask ourselves how many times we choose not to take such a brave stance about what daily happened around us.

From time to time, it is good to remember what happened in Europe between the two world wars. There are plenty of lessons of that period to be learned in order to avoid the repetition of that tragedy. Reading Boyd´s book is an usual but valuable manner to revisit that bleak period.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 24 de abril de 2019

Europe & Cybersecurity of 5G networks

Since the beginning of the year, there´s a growing concern of the cybersecurity of 5G networks in Europe. Perhaps, the best way to understand what has happened is a sentence that many time ago Bruce Schneier introduced in the quotes collection of the cybersecurity specialist,  "security is a mind state". Before US government began what we may benignly call a campaign on the need of a trusty 5G infrastructure, Europe had a blind trust in their network operators and their proceedings for infrastructure deployment. Now, this trust is broken, instability has been introduced in the European cybersecurity mind state and something has to be done to solve this trust crisis and achieve a new stable mind state.

From my point of view, it doesn't matter now the origin of this trust crisis, although we should not forget it. The center of the US campaign for a trusty 5G infrastructure has been the manufacturer which provides a growing share of the current 4G infrastructure in Europe, which will be the base for the deployment of 5G networks due to the evolutionary approach of its architecture. Therefore, although the accusations may have the smell of the "weapons of mass destruction" campaign before the second Irak war, Europe can not afford doing nothing and wait to see how it happens the first real cybersecurity incident in its 5G networks.

Due to the tiny size of each European national telecom market, there´s no space for nothing different than a shared European solution to this crisis of trust. Although Germany or UK may lead by example (as they are doing) with different national proposals for security requirements for mobile telecom operators, Europe will be sidelined of 5G race without a shared approach to a security assurance scheme for 5G networks. GSMA has politely remembered during the last MWC with its called for a proportionate and risk-based, as well as common, consistent and agreed, security assurance, testing and certification regime for Europe. It was not a surprise that all the eyes turned to the European Commission to make a proposal for this shared approach to cybersecurity for 5G networks.

However, the European Commission may has chosen the long and winding road for cybersecurity on 5G networks in Europe. Although the recently approved European Electronic Communications Code allow the European Commision to adopt an implementing act establishing armonised technical and organisational measures to appropriately manage the risks posed to the security of networks and services, the Commission has chosen to adopt only a recommendation for Member States with a set of actions to assess cybersecurity risks of 5G networks and to strengthen preventive measures in the national sphere by June 2019, with a later exchange of best practices in order to build up by December 2019 a toolbox of mitigating measures to address the identified cybersecurity risks on 5G networks. It is pretty sure that all Member States will make their best, but it has to be seen yet if this cooperative path produce a coherent approach to cybersecurity of 5G in Europe on time. Just after the publication of the European Commission recommendation, a 5G expert warned in the Financial Times that "This timescale is incompatible with the EU’s other objective to be a leader in 5G".

And while Europe is lost like a modern Teseo in the cybersecurity labyrinth, their competitors reap the first successes. Since April 3rd, 5G reduced commercial offers are available in a reduced scale in Corea and USA who passionately dispute the glory of being the first. Each month of delay in the deployment of reduced commercial offers in Europe may mean a delay in having full commercial 5G networks in the Union by 2025. This might mean for Europe a huge economic impact in the future, as the European Commission has estimated benefits of €113.1 billion per annum from 2025 in Europe from the introduction of 5G capabilities.

Someone may think that the US offensive in favour of cyber security of 5G networks would have a collateral benefit for Europe on the manufacturer area. The first market analyzes published this year are looking to confirm this approach with the dethronation of Huawei as the first mobile provider and Ericsson´s leadership in the share of expected shipments of 5G equipment. However, the security assurance of 5G networks in Europe will imply the security testing and certification of all the providers, and it is still to be see if Ericsson or Nokia would pass an strict cybersecurity scrutiny like the one that Huawei is yearly passing at the UK government.

Europe began to lose its importance as a technological competitor on the race for 4G deployment. The delay in 4G an effective spectrum assignment in some European countries blocked a uniform deployment of 4G networks across the Union preventing network operators to take advantage of the scalability of the European market.  When everything was looking bright in 5G deployment in Europe, an slow reaction to cybersecurity deployment may strike a final blow on Europe dreams of catching up US and China in the digital race.

miércoles, 17 de abril de 2019

"La Red Purpura" - Carmen Mola

La Red Púrpura (Elena Blanco, #2)La Red Púrpura by Carmen Mola
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Cuando aún estaba deslumbrado por "La novia gitana", el anterior caso de la Inspectora Blanco, se publicó su continuación, "La Red Púrpura". No pude evitar aparcar por unos días la lectura que traía entre manos para ferozmente devorarlo. El libro tiene una arranque frenético, quizás uno de los mejores en la novela negra de los últimos años, pero que de modo incomprensiblemente pierde fuelle, La pérdida de velocidad y la falta del final excepcional que tenía "La novia gitana", lastrado por las altas expectativas que generó aquella primera parte, convierte la novela en un ejercicio fallido, aunque de modo aislado podría considerarse un libro aceptable.

La novela, a pesar del sabor a decepción que deja, tiene aciertos indudables. La autora perfila mejor los personajes secundarios en la Brigada de Análisis de Casos dirigida por la Inspectora Blanco y realiza descripciones precisas de distintos ambientes de los bajos fondos. También mantiene la importancia de la banda sonora musical en la novela , saliendo además del corsé de las canciones de Mina para explorar múltiples interpretes y estilos, aunque quizás es un recurso que podría tener un mayor desarrollo en la segunda mitad del libro. No obstante, algunos de estos aciertos queda nublado por la previsibilidad de alguna de las líneas narrativas y la explotación escasa que realiza de otras que quizás podrían haber dado mayor empaque al conjunto.

Al respecto del argumento, es ciertamente la novela extrema que vende su publicidad. Dependiendo del gusto de cada cual, algunos pasajes pueden resultar de violencia excesiva o necesaria para mostrar el mal en toda su crudeza. Me inclino por lo segundo. La incorporación, además, de un enlace de la maldad del presente con la perversidad del pasado, desmitifica la culpabilidad que algunos hacen recaer sobre Internet en exclusiva de la criminalidad actual. El mal siempre ha estado aquí mutando en sus medios para ser más efectivo.

"La Red Púrpura" calmará (y quizás colmará) el deseo de continuidad que abrió "La novia gitana", sin embargo no te hará desear un nuevo caso de la Inspectora Blanco.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 10 de abril de 2019

"La novia gitana" - Carmen Mola

La novia gitanaLa novia gitana by Carmen Mola
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Leí la novela llevado por las buenas críticas que circulaban sobre ella en varios periódicos. No decepciona. Una buena idea bien desarrollada, un ritmo adecuado y las adecuadas dosis de sorpresas propias de una novela policiaca que se adentra en la novela negra. Es la novela ideal para desconectar al final del día o en los tránsitos de un lado a otro a lo largo de la jornada. Sin embargo, tampoco es la obra cumbre y gran renovación de la novela policiaca que algunos dicen. Sin ir más lejos y acudiendo a novelas del mismo estilo recientes, está un peldaño por debajo de "El final del hombre", de Antonio Mercero.

Gran elección y perfilado de la protagonista de la historia. El retrato de la inspectora Blanco es el retrato de la soledad tan frecuente en los detectives protagonistas de las novelas negras, pero que por primera vez veo bien trasladado a una mujer. Sin duda, algunas de las características del personaje son un cliché de otros detectives celebres (alcohólica, atormentada, coleccionista de relaciones sexuales), pero la autora realiza un traslado valiente a una carcasa de personaje femenino, descubriendo de modo progresivo cómo ha llegado a ser quien es. La afición al karaoke bajo los efectos etílicos de la inspectora redondea un personaje con recorrido, y obliga a leer la novela escuchando las piezas musicales que canta o recuerda de Mina, como un elemento más que da contexto a la historia.

De la trama de la novela, poco puede contarse sin reventar su disfrute. Como toda novela negra, tiene los ingredientes de despiste adecuados para despistar al lector acerca de quién es el criminal buscado, que es ocultado tras velos plausibles, facilitando al mismo tiempo los detalles para que una vez descubierto resulte coherente su identidad. La autora realiza también una perfecta preparación subterránea del camino hacia el episodio continuación de "La novia gitana", que culmina con un final de la obra que actúa como un mazazo moral al lector.

Una novela para leer, disfrutar y que impulsa a leer su continuación, "La Red Púrpura", pero esa, será otra historia.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 3 de abril de 2019

"Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow" - Yuval Noah Harari

Homo Deus: A Brief History of TomorrowHomo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

A lot of friends recommended me not to read "Homo Deus", but I did in spite of their critical view of Harari´s second book. Once I have finished it, I firmly dissent from their negative view of this essay. Of course, the book it is not as recommendable s Harari´s first book, "Homo sapiens", but probably this fact is due to the reason that it is a totally different kind of book. Do not be confused by the usage of the same didactic style, Harari´s second book a completely different kind of animal to the first one.

Yes, you can love "Homo Sapiens" and hate "Homo Deus". The first book is a review of human beings history, the kind of reading that helps you to fill the gaps in your culture and general knowledge. The later is a forecast of our collective future as an animal race, sometimes based on facts but the in great part based on the author personal ideology. Therefore, you might like the first book as a kind of history book and despise the second book as a mere exercise of science fiction. But you may also find both books readable and lightly enjoyable as it is my case.

The value of the Harari´s first book is to provide a landscape view of human beings history and what has made the humankind the master and commander of the earth, probably the unique for the majority of their readers. The value of "Homo Deus" is its invitation to reflect on our future, mainly on the impact of digitalisation and other high-end technologies on our social fabric and beliefs. Again, for the average reader of the book this may be the unique occasion when they think about these issues.

As a forecasting book, it is better not to spoil its content. However, it is needed to advance the final feeling you may feel flooded by pessimism once you have finished the book. In my case, I feel particularly worry with an undeniable fact highlighted by Harari that will frame our future: The decoupling between intelligence and consciousness. You may not be agreed with Harari´s design of the alternative futures for humankind, but this decoupling should concern you because, for instance, it is opening paths which could be fill of efficient solutions to problems but without taking into consideration the consequences for the social and economic environment.

Open your mind and read this book. Maybe, you will have a different perspective of what happens around you and its impact in the future.

View all my reviews

miércoles, 27 de marzo de 2019

Expanding the debate: Digital Ethics

According with the Cambridge dictionary, "ethics" means set of beliefs about what is morally right and wrong. Therefore, the term "AI Ethics" means the set of beliefs about what is morally right or wrong to do using AI technology. "AI ethics" has become one of the central elements of the debate on AI development and deployment, at least in Europe, Between the US entrepreunerial vision and the Chinese state-leading conception of AI, an ethical AI has emerged as the cornerstone for the European vision.

Certainly, it should be a central debate of AI development which are the non-technical limits on all the elements of the value chain, from the design of products to its usage without forgetting its construction. However, the debate is incomplete. Why we should ask ourselves only about "AI ethics" and not open a broader debate on "digital ethics"? Computers have been around us since the 70´s of the last century and massively since the year 2000, so perhaps it is high time to open the debate on "digital ethics". Even more, perhaps the root for the global mistrust and neoluddism is the absent of this debate in the last years.

Ethical questions and issues do not raise only from the usage of AI. The massive development of disruptive technologies poses question to us at every moment if we stop to look around.  Is it within the ethic limits the commersialisation of DIY-neurohacking devices without a knowledge of the long term effects over the brain? And what about the massive deployment of IoT based sensors around the city and capturing citizens generated data without their previous knowledge and consent? Or have we thought in of the implications in third-world countries of the constant renewal of en user devices without imposing circular schemes of manufacturing? Only three examples of dilemmas, and we have not included yet any related with the digital services we daily use.

Another unbalance of the articles and papers of the debate on AI ethics is its usual focus on the design of products and services. It is obvious that the deployment digital ethics should start by making it a boardroom issue. We would not have our democracies at risk now without an executive that had decided many years ago that digital targeting marketing was a good product to offer to anyone, included those with obscure political intentions. But the responsibility on digital ethics is spread across the whole digital value chain.

Sometimes, when we think in digital services as Facebook or Google we tend to personalise them end-to-end in their CEOs. Few times we think that these and all the products could not exist without the existance of engineers who has worked in their construction or marketing specialists who have design clever advertisement campaigns. The universalisation of digital ethics are also their responsibility. Microsoft workers provided an example to follow in this field with the letters they wrote to the executive staff signalling their unhappiness with some contracts won by the company to develop applications for the Army and the Immigration Control Agency. The message of the workers was clear "we refuse to create technology for warfare and oppression". Perhaps someone should think of including ethics in the engineering curricula.

Last but least, we consumers have also our share of responsibility on digital ethics. Maybe sometimes we have as an excuse not knowing all the implications of choosing one product or service, but even sometimes we fully understand them and we still use services that are based on precarious work due to its cheapness. Nevertheless, the starting point for demanding consumers more responsibility on digital ethics is a requirement for better and clearer information on products anda services to their manufacturers.

Digital ethics should neither be limited to one technology nor be the responsibility only of the boardrooms of tech companies. A wider debate should be opened and all the actors be provided with the right tools to be aware of their share of responsibility.

miércoles, 13 de marzo de 2019

Huawei War in movie mode

I am totally sure that in a few years time the controversy around 5G security will be remember among the first technology battles between USA and China, but surely not the last one. The time will say if we will remember the controversy as an equivalent to the Cuban´s Missile Crisis  or to the Weapons of Mass Destruction theory that paved the way to the 2nd Irak War. Or what it is the same,  as an episode where the US Administration provided evidences of a great conspirancy against world´s peace of a rivalry country or as the day that a  forgettable US  President tried to drive the whole world in a war without any real evidence.

We can compare this war with past wars and tactics, which give us a better view of the main actors. As i have already mentioned, it is difficult to say if US or Huawei are on the right side of the war, but you can find reasons to suspect from both.

To begin with US, we can start with the incident that start openly this war. In the manner of the I World War, a Sarajevo alike incident was suffered by an ally (the arrest of Huawei´s founder by Canada) and after that US started to scale-up the war. In this war, as what happened in the 2nd Irak War, US is pressing their European allies looking for a domino effect. So far without success, but another coincidence with the 2nd Irak War is that the sole declaration showing concerns about Huawei has came from Commissioner Ansip (an Estonian), part of the so-called new Europe.

Huawei for its part has not been waiting stoically the blows. Clearly, its tactics has been oriented to avoid the domino effect in Europe. And the main focus of its actions has been UK. Maybe, watching the interview with Huawei´s owner and the reference to their investments in UK (which are really huge), someone has remembered the scenes of the Godfather where Brando remember to someone all the things he has done for him. Probably, it is coincidence that the cautious position of UK on banning Huawei has been heavily disseminated around the same days.

The war is still going on. We will have yet to see some more battles of it. It is difficult to say if we will know who is right or wrong anytime soon. However, we what is sure is that we will still have to watch interesting episodes, it is advisable to have at hand some popcorns and your favourite soft drink.

miércoles, 6 de marzo de 2019

Algorithm transparency regulation

Europe has become the greatest Silicon´s Valley regulator. The Digital Single Market Strategy which started its implementation in 2015 has contributed to slash the fragmentation of the digital rules in Europe, and this achievement has been reached mainly through the definition of common rules for online businesses. As the main digital businesses in the world are located in Silicon´s Valley, the main outcome of the Digital Single Market is thirty new regulations which will have impact in the GAFA´s business models. 

And the impact of the new EU regulations will be global, not reduced to Europe. Now, the GAFA´s could threat with the abandonment of EU markets and how the rules stifle innovation, but its the result of their success in their lobby activities in Washington. As Washington has renounced to the regulation of the GAFAs, the EU has filled the void in a manner less beneficious to their interests. This is a lesson the have learned and since one year ago we have seen a less aggressive approach to regulation form the GAFAs: You cannot avoid indefinitely regulation so it is better to lobby for a friendly one than for not having any one at all.

One of the main worries of firms, consumers and citizens is the transparency of the algorithms at the core of GAFAs and other online platforms. There's not a neo luddite movement strong enough which directly calls for not using platforms and the platform dividend is recognised by its users. However, there´s a strong desire for the tools that allow a bigger knowledge on their algorithms and a validation of its fair and ethical design.

The Digital Single Market has made some progress also in the area of regulated algorithm transparency. On one hand, the right to explanation included in the Article 22 of the GDPR obligues platform to have at hand an explanation on how personal data affects the conclusion achieved by an algorithm. On the other hand, the P2B relationships regulation introduces the obligation to disclose the main parameters the platforms use to rank goods and services on their site.

However, there are still many other kind of algorithms not cover by the obligations of transparency included in the above EU regulations. Some of them as important as the work allocation algorithms used by Uber or Mechanical Turk, for instance. Even if we manage to regulate a new handful of types there would be more kind of algorithms unregulated than regulated. Therefore, the solution should be a flexible and holistic regulation, but soft enough for not stifling innovation.

One possible solution is taken the approach follow for the regulation of the pharmaceutical industry, with the creation of protocols and guidelines for the development of algorithms and agencies that may analise their design and the fulfillment of them within the respect of the commercial secret. The debate may be if a unique agency would be enough for the regulation of such as transversal matter as algorithms or we would need specialised agencies for each economic sector.

But all of this maybe the work for the renewal of the renewal of the digital single market strtaegy.

miércoles, 20 de febrero de 2019

AI and SDG in least developed countries

In 2015, the United Nations published the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a roadmap to guarantee a sustainable future by 2030. These goals range from ending hunger and poverty over realizing sustainable energy and gender equality to preserving our biodiversity. The tech community received the SDGs with a certain discomfort because, after an intense debate, there were not a specific goal for technological development.

In spite of the disappearance of technology from the front line of the SDGs, connectivity was immediately seen as a key driver for achieving the SDGs. Furthermore, increasing access to internet  and the proportion of global population covered by a mobile network were among the indicators and targets for the 9th SDG (9.c & 9.c.1). But until now, no other kind of technology different to connectivity were linked with achieving the SDGs. 

Everything has changed with the recent rise of interest for AI. Besides the debates on AI and ethics or AI and jobs which are happened in developed countries, ITU and UN organisations are pushing the debate on "AI for Good". The aim is to identify impactful AI solutions able to yield long-term benefits and help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. And there is not a lack of them. AI applications focused in healthcare, energy, agriculture, education and environmental protection. are blooming.

Undoubtedly, the usage of AI technology is surrounded by fears. We demand explainability and robustness of AI, we demand and ethical approach to AI. But the approach is completely different when you are fighting malnutrition or pandemias. In a more pragmatic view, their users claim that "We don't really need to understand these systems fully so long as the outcomes are good." Perhaps, it ís the only possible approach for the usage of AI to the achievement of SDGs in least developed countries. However, in the production side of the AI systems in the developed countries we have the obligation to guarantee this goodness.  As citizens of developed countries, we should be vigilant that AI is not used by our government as a tool for neo-colonialism taking advantage of the needs of the Least Developed Countries.
palyginti kainas